Category: Nonprofit

  • 52 Tips in 52 Weeks: Professional Development

    52 Tips in 52 Weeks: Professional Development


    So much of our experiences in the last few months have been out of the ordinary. So many intense, long work-days with short turn-around projects, presentations, and meetings—working diligently to meet the needs and challenges before us. One of the things that strikes me as truly extraordinary during the recent months working remotely is how much time I have invested in acquiring new skills, delving into topics and technologies for which my expertise was initially fairly elementary (or a brand new subject area), and generally learning as much as I could in a very short timeframe. I have had the opportunity to read multiple books and watch numerous webinars on new topics to increase my knowledge and expertise at the start of 2020, something I would not have expected to have the time to do this year. I had proposed a professional development plan for myself and for those whom I supervise at the start of the year, but what we’ve done so far in terms of growth and development has far exceeded any of my expectations and specific plans. When I review the robust (truly extraordinary!) numbers of individuals who have participated in programs and course offerings hosted by my organization over the last few months, I am certain that I am not alone in ramping up efforts to learn and develop during this unprecedented time.

    The Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector has always had a special focus on professional development. In fact, since the outset of the Standards for Excellence initiative in 1998, the program’s benchmark related to written, board-approved personnel policies has stated that “employee growth and development” should be featured in each nonprofit’s employee handbook, along with other important topics like “basic elements of the relationship (e.g., working conditions, telecommuting (if applicable), employee benefits, vacation, and sick leave). The policies should address orientation to the organization, employee evaluation, supervision, hiring and firing, grievance procedures… confidentiality of employee, client, and organization records and information.” Many nonprofit leaders are likely looking at professional development with a slightly different lens these days and encouraging their team members to take advantage of opportunities for growth in ways that may not have been outlined in detail at the start of the fiscal year. Given the changing landscape of our work environments, we have to stay flexible and responsive to new needs, and make sure our staff are learning the new skills they need to be successful in this new “normal.”

    The Standards for Excellence educational packet on Personnel Policies, Employee Orientation, Compensation, and  Evaluation includes a helpful Model Employee Handbook. The Model Employee Handbook, just updated and re-released in 2020, provides a comprehensive set of personnel policies including topics such as career development, workplace practices, leave policies, benefits, and insurance coverage, communication, compensation, and much more. The Standards for Excellence Model Employee Handbook also includes a comprehensive section on forms and additional information that can be customized and implemented in any nonprofit organization.

    This educational resource packet and the full series of all packets  – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a Licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.

  • 52 Tips in 52 Weeks: Navigating Whistleblower Policies

    52 Tips in 52 Weeks: Navigating Whistleblower Policies

    I read with interest a recent article from the Philadelphia Inquirer entitled “Philadelphia Mulls Protections for COVID-19 Workplace Whistleblowers.” (June 11, 2020 by Karen Kahn). The story discusses a bill that the Philadelphia City Council is considering which would protect employees who speak up about unsafe conditions in their workplaces related to COVID-19 risks and transmissions.

    The story cites the findings from the National Employment Law Project (NELP)’s recent study, Silenced About COVID-19 in the Workplace by Irene Tung and Laura Padin.  NELP’s report is a national study and illustrates “that retaliation against whistleblowers in the workplace is prevalent during the pandemic” and that “Black workers are more likely to work under conditions that are both hazardous and repressive.”  The report goes on to say that “Black workers are more than twice as likely as white workers to have seen possible retaliation by their employer.”[1] The researchers used Google Consumer Surveys and polled 1,137 individuals in May 2020. These issues are so important for us to focus on and commit to redress.

    As the Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector states, “Organizations must provide employees, board members, and volunteers a confidential means to report suspected impropriety or misuse of organizational resources. Organizations should have in place a policy prohibiting retaliation against persons reporting improprieties.”

    Nonprofit organizations should do all they can to foster a culture of openness and accountability. Nonprofit leaders should attempt to uncover and eliminate misconduct at the earliest possible stage whether the misconduct is related to finances, COVID-19 or something else entirely. Research supports that employees are more likely to make the decision to report internally when internal reporting channels are perceived as adequate.[2] Organizations should have a process and mechanism to encourage individuals associated with a nonprofit to report suspected impropriety.

    With the advent of the American Competitiveness and Corporate Accountability Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act), more and more nonprofit organizations have been implementing whistleblower protection policies. While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act addresses governance standards and financial oversight in publicly traded companies, it does not specifically regulate nonprofit organizations – with two notable exceptions:  whistleblower protection and document destruction. For nonprofit organizations, Sarbanes-Oxley requires all corporations, whether or not they are publicly traded, to adopt and abide by document destruction policies and whistleblower protections. In order for nonprofits to meet the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, these two policies are needed.

    As nonprofit leaders, we must make sure that we are not only complying with the law to the fullest extent but we are taking great care to ensure that our policies and processes are working well for our staff, board members, and those we serve.  Instituting a whistleblower policy is one important way that nonprofits can do this in their day-to-day work.

    For more information on whistleblowing in nonprofits, we encourage you to check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet “Reporting Misconduct and Whistleblower Protection”  which includes benefits of reporting improprieties, examples of misconduct and improprieties, confidential means to report improprieties, protections for those that blow the whistle, implementing a whistleblower policy, as well as sample whistleblower policy and reporting form.

    This educational resource packet and the full series of all packets  – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.


    [1] Tung, Irene and Padin, Laura, Silenced About Covid-19 in the Workplace, National Employment Law Project, June 10, 2020, https://www.nelp.org/publication/silenced-covid-19-workplace/.

    [2]Watts, L., & Ronald Buckley, M. (2017). A Dual-Processing Model of Moral Whistleblowing in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics146(3), 669–683.

  • 52 Tips in 52 Weeks Blog: Building Public Trust

    52 Tips in 52 Weeks Blog: Building Public Trust

    Like you, we follow the headlines. Of course, the headlines have been dominated the last few months with news and updates about the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our communities, country and world. We’ve been keeping up with the infection rates, the numbers of deaths and recoveries, and the situations related to stay-at-home orders and news on re-opening. Most recently, we’ve been overwhelmed and profoundly saddened by the headlines about systemic racism, life-threatening situations faced by people of color, and the demands for justice and equity.

    At the Standards for Excellence Institute, as we work to be nonprofit standard-bearers, we also follow headlines on trust and confidence in the nonprofit sector. Our mission is to promote the highest standards of ethics and accountability in nonprofit governance, management and operations, and to facilitate adherence to those standards by all nonprofit organizations. We have two overarching goals—strengthening nonprofits and enhancing the public’s trust in the nonprofit sector. We celebrate when we learn that public trust is on the upswing and we are disheartened when the public’s trust and confidence in the nonprofit sector wanes. We’ve seen our fair share of both since the inception of the Standards for Excellence program in 1998.

    Earlier this month, we were thrilled to read one particular set of headlines in the Chronicle of Philanthropy “Trust in Nonprofits Rises…” On June 4, 2020, Chronicle reporter Michael Theis penned an article outlining the results of a May 2020 poll of Americans by Luth Research, and the Nonprofit Institute at the University of San Diego’s School of Leadership and Education Sciences [1] that found “70 percent of Americans said they either had a ‘fair amount’ or a ‘great deal’ of confidence in the nonprofit response to the pandemic.” The confidence in state and local government and federal government were much less positive and fell to 65% and 44% respectively.

    To many in the sector, these confidence numbers are probably not a complete surprise. It seems that wherever you look, you can see nonprofits stepping up to meet the needs of community members and neighbors facing needs and challenges in the midst of the pandemic. They are offering medical care, educational services, arts and culture, and food and basic human needs. They are speaking out for equal justice and equity, and calling for an end to racism. The needs are great and our colleagues in the nonprofit sector are stepping up in heroic ways every day. This is how we earn the public’s trust. We bring our very best to our communities as we deliver on our many missions. We work to improve the lives of our neighbors in hundreds of ways. We seek to strengthen organizations and networks for greater quality of life and equity. That is our cause, and our promise, and we ask you for your trust.

    The Standards for Excellence Institute has created a series of educational resource packets to help nonprofits strengthen the ways that they manage and govern.  The Institutes’ collection, a full series of all packets – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.


    [1] 350 Americans were survey as part of this sample in the Luth Research/University of San Diego School of Leadership and Education Sciences study and has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent.

  • 52 tips in 52 weeks blog: May I Announce My Candidacy on Your Front Steps?

    52 tips in 52 weeks blog: May I Announce My Candidacy on Your Front Steps?

    News headlines in the recent past have been filled with stories of candidates for political office using nonprofit organizations as backdrops for their campaigning efforts without asking for permission and in some cases, while harming people in the process. To many, these graphics are disturbing. To others, the graphics are sickening, grotesque, or worse. 

    What happens if a political candidate approaches your organization with a request to hold a campaign event, such as announcing their candidacy on the front lawn of your organization’s headquarters?  What should you do if a group of candidates reach out to you because they would like to do a campaign commercial and wish to engage some of the individuals who you serve while they are receiving services from your organization?  Does it matter if the candidate for office is connected with your organization?  What if the candidate is a current or former board member or volunteer? Does it make a difference if the candidate is one of your major donors?

    We know that in some instances, candidates shoot their pictures first and ask permission later. We know in other instances, candidates capture their images featuring nonprofits in a way that creates the perception of implied endorsement without even talking with the nonprofit about their intentions. Interestingly, it should not matter if the candidate is connected with your organization or not when you are determining if you should align your organization with a partisan campaign. Nonprofits exempt under Section 501(c)(3) must avoid situations where they are or appear to be endorsing political parties or candidates for elected office.

    Your nonprofit’s facility, signage, mission, and work are important assets of the organization. We need to do all that we can to foster the public’s trust in our organizations and when political candidates or parties want to advance their campaigns by using your “good name or brand”, we can all suffer. Certainly, there is a potential problem associated with loss of reputation, but there is an even greater risk associated with loss of our very tax-exempt status. 

    As nonprofit leaders, we need to do ALL that we can to avoid any and all situations that create the appearance of partisanship in our organizations.  We need to ensure that our organizations are not giving permission (explicit or implicit) to candidates or political parties for any of our assets to be used as instruments in the partisan political process. We need to avoid situations where we are supporting or fighting against political candidates, political parties or partisan activity.   Since its release in 1998, the Standards for Excellence code has stressed the importance of avoiding partisanship in all manners and states,  “In promoting public participation in community affairs, charitable nonprofits must be diligent in assuring they do not participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.”

    The IRS (instructions for Schedule A of the Form 990) states that “All charities.. are absolutely prohibited from intervening in a political campaign for or against any candidate for an elective public office. If a charity does intervene in political campaigning, it will lose both its tax-exempt status and its ability to receive tax-deductible contributions.”

    When candidates ask permission of nonprofits before they act, nonprofits can be in the best position to determine what is partisan and what is not and to act accordingly.  In some cases, candidates reach out to nonprofits to rent or lease their space for campaign or election related needs and there are a series of factors that the nonprofits must consider as they are determining to move forward or turn down the request in order to avoid partisan activity[1}

    When candidates act first and use a nonprofit’s likeness, building, logo, or services as a prop for campaigns, in a way that implies the organization’s support, the nonprofit should act to  disavow or disassociate itself from the campaign or candidacy.  According to guidance from the IRS, to be effective, disavowal just be made “in a timely manner equal to the original actions…[including] steps to ensure that such unauthorized actions do not recur.” [2]


    For more information on avoiding situations where your nonprofit appears to be engaging in partisan politics, we encourage you to check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet  Advancing the Mission through Public Policy.  We also encourage you to check out the resources published through the Bolder Advocacy effort at the Alliance for Justice on related issues.

    The Standards for Excellence educational resource packet and the full series of all packets  – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.


    [1] IRS Revenue Ruling 2007-41, in Situations 17 and 18, provides a full discussion about whether activities such as renting space, selling or renting mailing list or selling paid advertising counts as partisan political activity.  There are a variety of factors considered including: whether the good, service or facility is available to candidates in the same election on an equal basis; whether the good, service, or facility is available only to candidates and not to the general public; whether the fees charged to candidates are at the organization’s customary and usual rates, and whether the activity is an ongoing activity of the organization or whether it is conducted only for a particular candidate. For more information, review the Internal Revenue Bulletin linked above.

    [2] Internal Revenue Service 2002 CPE Text Election Year Issues-Attribution and Disavowal. This discussion was focused on organization leaders, but it appears to provide assistance for this topic as well.

  • Attention Nonprofit Consultants!

    Attention Nonprofit Consultants!

    Are you ready to take your nonprofit consulting services to the next level?

    The Standards for Excellence Institute’s Licensed Consultant Training is an exclusive professional development initiative that gives independent consultants the knowledge, skills, and tools necessary to work with nonprofit organizations across the country interested in learning about, implementing, and becoming accredited by the Standards for Excellence Program. Applications are due July 8th for the November 2020 program.

    The Standards for Excellence® Institute continues to build a national network of qualified nonprofit consultants licensed to provide training, consulting, and support on the Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector.

    APPLY TODAY!


    Licensed Consultant Training Participant Profile

    Robbie MacCue

    “As someone who was the President of a nonprofit, I wish that I knew about the Standards for Excellence Institute sooner. The wisdom and knowledge of so many nonprofit and governance leaders is captured in the Institute’s easy-to-understand guiding principles, providing a clear pathway for nonprofits to follow to succeed. I look forward to bringing the Standards model to as many Emergency Services and Health and Human Services organizations as possible with my new status as a Licensed Consultant.”

    Robbie MacCue, MBA
    Licensed Consultant
    EMS Leadership Academy 

  • Developing Your Own Statement

    Developing Your Own Statement


    The Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector calls for “all organizations to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion into their work as part of their missions.”  Most organizations have incorporated these principles into their organizational values, visions and goals.  The killing of George Floyd at the hands of police has created untold pain and fear among Black communities but has also mobilized leaders and organizations from across the nation to stand against systemic racism.  Staying silent in this time is not an option for organizations that have embraced a true commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.  Making a statement can highlight your organization’s unique mission and expertise, and provide an opportunity for you to educate the community on how the field in which you work is impacted by systemic racism.  It can also help your organizational stakeholders to clarify your analysis and action steps you can take.

    Below are some steps to take in preparing an organizational statement:

    • Read and listen to Black voices.
    • Have an organizational conversation. Invite Black people to speak first if they choose to do so.
    • Discuss the meaning of your mission, vision, and values statements in this context. How are they reflected your response?
    • Expect push-back, and talk about it in advance. Receiving criticism of your statement may be the sign that you are part of creating change, not just stating platitudes.  Your response to criticism will help you further your analysis and commitment.

    For the content of your statement, consider the following questions:

    • What is your mission, who do you serve, and how are people you are serving impacted by systemic racism?
    • What are our organizational values and how do we put those values into action now?
    • What analysis can we provide that is unique to our field?
    • How does our analysis link to broader, systemic, and institutional racism?
    • What help can we offer?
    • What actions will we take, and what commitments are we making?

    Always be non-partisan.  See resources from Alliance for Justice on 501(c)(3) rules for addressing the actions of incumbent officials in an election year.

    The process of creating a statement can help you deepen your commitment to racial equity, and uncover priorities you may have to deepen your work in this area.  We invite you to claim your expertise and stretch to consider and name laws or policies in your field that need to be examined with a racial equity lens.
     

    For more information on how you can incorporate the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion into the mission of your organization, please check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion which offers advice and assistance on assessing your own diversity, equity and inclusion values, creating a strong and effective DEI policy, understanding the terms and language, as well as sample assessment and planning tools.

    The Standards for Excellence educational resource packet and the full series of all packets  – including sample policies, tools, and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a Licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute. Members of Maryland Nonprofits have access to this and all 27 Standards for Excellence Educational Resource Packets through the member portal.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.

  • Saying No to Proxy Voting on your Board

    Saying No to Proxy Voting on your Board

    Nonprofits are facing tough choices during this challenging time.

    As we discussed in last week’s 52 Tips blog post, nonprofit board members are needed now more than ever. Organizations are stretched, and need strong support from their governing bodies. The Standards for Excellence code offers the important tenet that “Board members are in a position of trust to ensure that resources are used to carry out the mission of the organization.” Boards cannot allow a lapse in service, especially now when so much is uncertain.

    You may find that board members have great intentions for being excellent board members, but sometimes are simply not able to fulfill responsibilities – such as regularly attending board meetings. Perhaps one of your board members serves as an essential worker (such as a nurse or a doctor or is involved in the food supply chain) and their work in this arena places severe limits on their ability to attend board meetings during the time of the pandemic.

    What if a dedicated board member wishes to participate but cannot attend a board meeting (or two or three or more)? What if the board member asked to send a proxy or a representative in his/her place? For situations like this, it is vital that we refer back to the Standards for Excellence code, especially the benchmark that states, “The board should be composed of individuals who are personally committed to the mission of the organization and understand their roles as fiduciaries in performing the legal duties of a governing body.”

    There is a misconception that an individual board member can delegate his/her vote to another board member when he/she cannot be present at the meeting. This is not the case. Generally, the use of proxies is considered a breach of an individual’s fiduciary responsibility as a board member and is contrary to law in many states. Proxy voting (or sending a representative in place of a board member) is a practice that should be avoided at all costs. In situations like we are experiencing, where in person meetings may be impossible, boards may wish to adjust their regular meeting time or day of the week in order to accommodate board members that may have less time for board activities during the current pandemic. For instance, your board may traditionally meet on Fridays at 10 am, but may find that greater participation can be garnered if you moved board meetings to a weekend or weeknight instead of during its “regular” time. Of course, you’ll want to follow your bylaws regarding providing notice of board meetings. Many boards have likely moved their board gatherings to virtual settings so perhaps the fact that meetings are more efficient and do not include any commuting time may make a move to a time that is not traditional easier for all involved.

    For more information on what voting practices are permitted, we encourage you to check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet Board Member Responsibilities which includes helpful resources and discussion on topics such as proxy voting, governance and fiduciary responsibilities, bylaws, board policies, expectations for board members, as well as board member development, training and orientation.

    This educational resource packet and the full series of all packets – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.

  • Board Members: We Need You Now More Than Ever Before

    Board Members: We Need You Now More Than Ever Before


    We are living in unprecedented and uncertain times. For many of us, the normal cycle of work and life has been turned completely upside down. Nonprofits of all sizes are wrestling with more challenging and difficult decisions than they ever have before.

    To weather the current situation, we must engage in our organizational best thinking, from staff and board leadership. Every resource at our disposal should be deployed to meet the challenges. Nonprofit staff members cannot and should not be expected to do this alone. As the Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector states, “Nonprofits depend upon effective leadership to successfully enact their missions and programs. Effective leadership consists of a partnership between the board and management, each of which plays an essential role.”

    At this crucial time, nonprofit boards should be engaged and leading in a way that will help the nonprofits they serve survive the current challenges and the tough times that lay ahead. Here’s how:

    Meet as Often as Needed
    Many nonprofits are having to quickly adjust their strategies in response to the current climate. This means that the board of directors might need to meet more frequently than usual. The Standards for Excellence code encourages nonprofit boards to “meet as frequently as needed to fully and adequately conduct the business of the organization. At a minimum, the board should meet four (4) times a year.” We know that many boards are increasing the frequency of their board meetings—and, as a matter of necessity, holding remote board meetings using various technologies where all members can hear and be heard, or understand and be understood.

    Know What is Expected of You as a Board Member and do That
    This is the time for board members to lean into their responsibilities of governance and fiduciary leadership for the organization, honoring the public’s trust in the organization and its leadership, so that the organization can continue to serve future generations in their communities.

    Each board of directors should have clearly stated expectations for their responsibilities which as the Standards for Excellence code states, should address, at a minimum, “attendance at meetings, participation in fundraising activities, committee service, and involvement in program activities.” There is no time like the present to remind board members of their crucial responsibilities. And if you do not have formal board member job descriptions, now is a great time to establish them.

    If you’re unsure of how to do this, our Standards for Excellence educational resource packet Board Member Responsibilities is a great place to start. This packet includes discussions and resources on board members’ governance, fiduciary, and legal responsibilities, bylaws, policies, board member expectations and evaluations of members’ performance, meetings and attendance

    Help Your Nonprofit Fundraise and Connect with Resources
    Nonprofits need their board members to step up and help raise funds and develop the resources, especially in situations where budgeted income is no longer expected or anticipated due to the economic climate. Despite the environment, this may be the single most important moment for board member involvement in raising resources for their organizations.

    Know the Best Practices for Nonprofit Boards
    The full series of Standards for Excellence educational packets include sample policies, tools, and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management. They can be accessed by contacting a Licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We thank each board member for your continued support of the nonprofit sector share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.

  • Purchasing During COVID-19

    Purchasing During COVID-19

    Buying supplies, equipment, and mission-critical resources have always been an art as well as a science for many nonprofits. Nonprofit leaders strive to be the best stewards of their resources and work diligently to get the most for their money while having just the right amount of inventory on hand at all times.

    In these times, when we’re all in the midst of the pandemic, the purchasing needs have likely changed dramatically for a lot of nonprofits. For nonprofits providing around the clock care and services to individuals in need, their purchasing needs have likely increased dramatically.  Items that were not on the “regular” procurement lists, such as hard to find personal protective equipment (“PPE”) of all types, are suddenly on the purchasing list.   And, not only do we need to find ways to pay for the items, but we need to find suppliers willing and available to help us obtain these crucial items.  These nonprofits have been working hard to make the connections and do the research to buy the items needed to keep their staff and the people they serve safe and healthy.

    For some nonprofits like ours, we have been working in a remote environment for more than two months and now face a future reality where we will eventually be moving back to our office environment in a way that promises to be “anything but normal.”  Like nonprofits around the world, my colleagues have been working to source personal protective equipment, cleaning supplies, hand sanitizer, and equipment for health screenings.  Some of these items will be straightforward and simple to procure.  Other items will be trickier to obtain.

    As I sat on my computer a few nights ago, I was genuinely tempted to buy hundreds and hundreds of one particular product needed in these times.  I had to intentionally check myself and asked, what’s the purchasing policy at our organization?  How does our process for making purchases inform how decisions should be made about what to purchase and how to determine the best vendor to select?  I know that a good purchasing policy serves as a tool for maximizing available resources of funds, personnel and time and generally cover topics like:

    • Researching sources
    • Selecting vendors (addressing when competitive bidding should be employed)
    • Negotiating prices
    • Using consultants
    • Documenting the selection process
    • Separating responsibilities for the various steps in purchasing
    • Using staff time efficiently
    • Considering community or environmental conditions (such as buying local or buying from sources that are reflective of our mission)

    These are trying times and nonprofits are making heroic efforts to secure the items they need to have on hand immediately to keep their staff, volunteers, and the people they serve safe and healthy, and strong purchasing policies can provide some important insight for our organizations.

    For more information on purchasing policies for nonprofits, we encourage you to check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet Financial Policies and Internal Controls which includes helpful resources and discussion around purchasing and also provides a model purchasing policy.

    This educational resource packet and the full series of all packets  – including sample policies, tools, and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a Licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.

  • 52 tips in 52 Weeks: Check in with your board—Update their profiles

    52 tips in 52 Weeks: Check in with your board—Update their profiles

    Since the Standards for Excellence program’s inception, nonprofits have received advice about how to run their board meetings, recruit new members, and avoid conflicts of interest, just to name a few of the ways we seek to strengthen boards. The Leadership section of the Standards for Excellence: An Ethics and Accountability Code for the Nonprofit Sector is a comprehensive section and includes benchmarks and best practices of the full range of board and staff leadership measures, as well as diversity, equity and inclusion – values applicable to all nonprofits.

    By now, in the midst of the pandemic, you have probably already checked in with your board members to see how they are doing and may have had a virtual board meeting or two. Perhaps you’ve had a few members that have missed a virtual meeting. If you haven’t done so already, it would be a good time to confirm that your board members have access to the technology needed to be active and govern remotely. Also, be prepared to make adjustments to ensure maximum participation. Inquiring about such issues will help everyone stay on the same page and ready to serve.

    While you are checking in, it may also be helpful to gather information to assess the current composition of your board.

    The Standards for Excellence states:

    · “The board should be composed of individuals who are personally committed to the mission of the organization and understand their roles as fiduciaries in performing the legal duties of a governing body;”

    · “The board should establish a rigorous board development strategy for recruiting and selecting new members and ensuring that the board has an appropriate mix of talent, connections to the community, and diversity.”

    Obtain updated biographical sketches for your board members. This information can help you to understand the background and key talents that your board members bring to the board room. This will help to refresh or expand your knowledge of their talents and interests—some of which may be particularly helpful in this time of pandemic.

    Are you bringing on new board members in the coming months? Seize the opportunity to make connections with current members and new members—with folks serving as board member mentors for others. Having bios in hand may help you with matching up such individuals and making rich and meaningful introductions. Profiles can also be shared with new board members through a board handbook or portal to facilitate introductions and team building.

    For more information on the composition of nonprofit boards, we encourage you to check out the Standards for Excellence educational resource packet Board Composition and Independence. This packet includes discussions and resources on board members’ commitment to the organization, employees serving on the board, board recruitment and selection, nominating processes and board development, board diversity, term limits, board size, and the voluntary nature of board members’ service.

    This educational resource packet and the full series of all packets – including sample policies, tools and model procedures to help nonprofits achieve best practices in their governance and management – can be accessed by contacting a licensed Standards for Excellence replication partner, one of the over 150 Standards for Excellence Licensed Consultants, or by becoming a member of the Standards for Excellence Institute.

    We share our sincere wishes for your continued good health and patience as we all navigate these challenging and uncertain times.